Activist convicted of conspiracy to commit criminal damage whilst protesting for Palestine Action Group

May 30, 2023 | Single Issue Terrorism, Threat Analysis

Author: Julian Stone BEM, 
Principal Threat Analyst 

Read Time: 3 minutes 

As of May 2023, a fourth activist linked with the Palestine Action Group (PAG) protest group was found guilty of conspiracy to commit criminal damage following a pro-Palestine protest at the factory of an electronics manufacturer in eastern Wales on 09 December 2022.[1]

Reporting has suggested that the protest caused up to £1.2 million of damage to the factory site as the activists conducted a multiphase protest. Two of the activists allegedly scaled the building before smashing glass and drilling holes in the roof. The other two activists entered the factory floor before smashing computer screens, spraying paint and setting off smoke grenades.[2]

The activists reportedly targeted the site due to its alleged links with an Israeli arms company, Elbit Systems, however, it was later discovered that any business ties between the Welsh site and the arms company were ended in 2009.[3]

Palestine Action Group is a protest group that supports pro-Palestine causes. Its ‘calling card’ tactic is the use of red paint to spray a targeted site or location alongside multiple other highly disruptive protest tactics. For the past 24 months, the main campaign of the group has been the targeting of UK-based factories and offices of the Israeli arms company Elbit systems.[4]

Whilst this incident was not declared as a terrorist event, the prosecutor of the case reportedly likened the incident to a ‘terrorist’ attack.[5]

Assessment

    • It is highly likely that the Palestine Action Group will continue its highly disruptive ongoing campaign against any business or site with links to Elbit Systems until the company leaves the UK or the group runs out of individuals willing to conduct disruptive protest actions due to arrest or loss of support.
    • It is almost certain that the Palestine Action Group will increase the frequency of its protest efforts in line with any periods of increased tension or escalation in the Israel-Palestine situation. This is highly likely to include protests against business and sites outside of the Elbit Systems network.
    • It is almost certain that the Palestine Action Group will continue to seek to work with other protest groups that hold similar ideological positions in order to conduct a higher frequency of highly disruptive protests e.g. In February 2021, the Palestine Action Group conducted a joint protest against an Elbit Systems linked property with members of the Extinction Rebellion North Sub-Group.[6]
    • It is unlikely that any highly disruptive protest group in the UK would have the intent to conduct an act that could be designated as terrorism by the UK government at this time.
    • It is almost certain that some highly disruptive protest groups in the UK have the intent to conduct actions that lead to the destruction of property at business and government sites across the UK.
    • At this time, there is a remote chance that any active protest groups in the UK have the intent to conduct protest actions that cause harm to any individuals. However, some groups have previously demonstrated a lack of empathy towards ill or injured individuals disrupted by protest actions. E.g., an Insulate Britain spokesperson demonstrated limited contrition after one woman allegedly had her condition significantly worsened after not receiving timely treatment for a stroke due to a protest by the group that caused significant delay on the M25 motorway (London).[7]
    • It is likely that any protest related incident that meets the threshold to be designated as terrorism would be conducted by self-initiated, radicalised individuals with association to protest groups. It is highly likely that any individual would seek to target infrastructure, buildings or vehicles as part of this protest e.g., radicalised eco protester targeting an oil terminal. There is a realistic possibility that individuals associated with extreme right wing protest groups could seek to target individuals as part of any terrorist attack e.g., radicalised extreme right wing individual targeting individuals with links to refugee or LGBTQIA communities.
    • In the long term, there is a realistic possibility that some, more extreme protest groups could seek to conduct acts that meet the threshold to be designated as terrorism. Any escalation would almost certainly be driven by a failure of targeted businesses and government to meet the demands of the protest group.

    Intelligence Cut-Off Date: 30 May 2023

      PHIA Scale

      The “Probability Yardstick” (below) is a standardised instrument used to provide professional intelligence assessments. Judgements made using the yardstick are relative and reflect the analyst’s confidence in their findings and assessments.

        • Almost Certain: An event is assessed to have a greater than 90% chance of occurring.
        • Highly Likely: An event is assessed to have a 76% to 90% chance of occurring.
        • Likely: An event is assessed to have a 55% to 75% chance of occurring.
        • Realistic Possibility: An event is assessed to have a 40% to 54% chance of occurring.
        • Unlikely: An event is assessed to have a 25% to 39% chance of occurring.
        • Highly Unlikely: An event is assessed to have an 10% to 24% chance of occurring.
        • Remote Chance: An event is assessed to have a less than 10% chance of occurring.

        Time Spans

          • Short Term: 0 – 6 Months.
          • In the next 12 months.
          • Medium Term: 12 months – 5 Years.
          • Long Term: 5+ Years.

      Author: Julian Stone BEM, 
      Principal Threat Analyst 

      Read Time: 3 minutes

      To receive regular updates about Terrorism Threat and Risk Management, please sign up to our newsletters now.